FOR MEN WHO HAVE BEEN, OR ARE BEING, OR WHO MIGHT IN THE FUTURE
BE F*CKED OVER BY MASONS, ZIONISTS OR THE REST OF THE ILLUMINATI
NEW WORLD ORDER MAFIA WHO ABUSE GOOD MEN FOR PROFIT. MUCH OF IT
AIDED BY THE PRESS BARONS IN THE ZIONIST BACKED COMPLIANT MEDIA.
DANGER ZONES FOR MENS HEALTH AND WEALTH
1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
11. Allow social workers, lawyers and judges with a homosexual
agenda to decide
on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM AND US
THE MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET ARE THE LEAST IMPORTANT PEOPLE
OR AT LEAST HOW THE PRESS BARONS AND THEIR SCUMBAG JOURNALISTS PORTRAY THEM
We all strive to better ourselves , in our lives and in our children's lives, but
that should NOT be at the expense of others. The ruling mafia have created an underclass
for a number of reasons and would include letting us all know that if we do not
follow their rules we may end up on the streets. Also their mass media propaganda
machine ensures the poor, disabled, vulnerable and sick can be used as a punch bag and
blamed for ALL the ills of the world and have us believe it is the POOR that are
stopping us from bettering ourselves.
This is maybe the most ruthless and devious lie created by the press barons who
have ensured the sheeple's venom is vented towards those least able to defend
themselves while distracting attention away from the ruling mafia
who live opulent lifestyles and with riches so VAST no one can truly comprehend
how vast that wealth is.
Fortunately the internet is rewriting history and exposing the myths within
a propaganda machine that must break this despicable cycle of deceit and
were a psychological battle has been waged on our minds to ensure we
remain compliant with the ruling elite's demands. We must all re-learn
to respect those who need our sympathy and understanding, not venom, and we
must also be aware that every man facing injustice will allow in the end all
men to face that same injustice .
Without fighting for the weakest in our society, while complying with the
ruling mafia's orders, we condone and perpetuate a well orchestrated master plan
that will allow these evil bastards to hold onto power unless our humanity has
a massive wake up call and remove that ruling elite from power
in one way or another. It is only in the interests of the ultra wealthy that this system
can carry on ad infinitum. Everyone else will continue to suffer, as they have
done throughout history, while the ruling mafia carry on their deceitful and
diabolical plans and all part of their new technological order.
IF YOU THINK YOUR LIFE IS BAD OR MISERABLE IT IS BECAUSE OF THE RICH NOT THE POOR.
The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them
any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.
WE PROMOTE PEOPLE THE CORPORATE MEDIA IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.
WRITTEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HAVE NOTS AS OPPOSED TO THE MASS MEDIA
RUN BY ULTRA-RICH PRESS BARONS LOOKING DOWN AT THE PEASANTS
ONLY FOR THOSE AS YET TO WAKEN UP.
Do you think the cops are there to protect you from criminals?
Do you think judges are there to give you justice?
Do you think lawyers are there to protect your freedoms?
Do you think legal aid is paid to poor litigants?
Do you think bailiff's act honestly when evicting homeowners?
Do you think social workers are there to protect your children?
Do you think politicians are there to ensure your welfare?
Do you think local authority chiefs are there to provide you with services?
Do you think psychiatrists are there to guard your mental health?
Do you think the banks are there to make YOU prosperous?
Do you think the media are there to enlighten us?
Do you think teachers are there to educate ?
Do you think the armed forces are there to protect your security?
Do you think regulators are there to ensure all of the above stay in line?
If you have been reading and watching the complicit media for most of your life you likely have been brainwashed into believing all of the above, when in fact many are criminals or forced to act in a criminal way for their masters. They only get away with murder to protect the self appointed elite pulling the strings of their satanically controlled duped goons who act ONLY in the interests of the psychopathic madmen and women running the world while living in VAST OPULENCE.
You might also believe that the latest credit crunch is affecting everybody, but look closely at the facts and you will see there is a tier of privileged individuals who NEVER suffer during controlled recessions. In fact they PROSPER while millions struggle to survive the sudden changes of fortune brought about by the few at the top deciding to rein in the pittance they provide in sustenance to the masses primarily to stop any major dissent from their form of enslavement and tyranny . For centuries these few dynastic families have been getting away with absolute murder turning generation upon generation of our forefathers into slaves for the ultra wealthy. Unless we stop them now our children and grandchildren will suffer the same deviant world they claim is some kind of civilized society. They have required a massive propaganda network to get away with this for so long, but by the day that machine is grinding to a halt in the mass exposure of the monstrous evil they have been getting away with.
Do not be fooled by the fancy clothes and ancient traditions, these mobsters have been using subtle and devious tricks of the trade , disguised as some sort of esoteric knowledge, or so they claim, while using thuggery, blackmail, bullying and abuse to persecute anyone who steps outside their masonic bubble. These maniacs and psychopaths have been raping and murdering in endless wars they create to keep us all in fear and in our lowly place.
THEY ONLY HAVE THAT POWER AS LONG AS WE LET 'EM.
COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS THAT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Your passionate way with words is a daily source of energy to me and, I would expect, lots of others subscribers---keep it up!!...john
There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating
feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle.
But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands
above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it):
International Men’s Organisation.
From a review by the
NWO University Forum
Brilliant website matey I read it often and it blows my mind how much information
you have gathered over the years well done dude. Sullers
RELIABLE TRUTH SITES
partisan 17 June 2012
These are some sites that I find informative and balanced and more so,
those sites somehow inspire and move one towards the light of Truth.
I have been reading stuff on your website for some time and can relate to everything
that is being exposed. Glad there is a website out there which is really showing up
and exposing it all. Kind regards DR
Hi! Great site! Telling it like it is. Keep it up!
Love the site, you have a done an awesome job
I am an avid reader of International Mens Organisation. JB
We love intmensorg.info!
I really appreciate your collection of resources on the intmensorg.info website.
Thank you for your wonderful resources.
I just checked your website and I am blown away!! Its so cool to be in contact with you!!
I have been reading your site for some time now and gaining a deep insight into the
workings of this so called democratic western world we live in. I would like to show
my appreciation and gratitude. Thank you very much. Just as a good mate of mine
always says: Ignorance is the worst sin.
Therefore the revealing of knowledge and understanding must be the greatest virtue.
Thanks again Rory UK
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work.
Dear Sirs ,
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden
ALL OUR STORIES ARE IMPORTANT STORIES WITH LITTLE ROOM FOR FRIVOLOUS SHITE THAT
THE GUTTER PRESS IS FULL OF DISTRACTING THE SHEEPLE. HOPEFULLY ONE DAY THE WORLD'S COMPLIANT
MEDIA WILL START REPORTING NEWS AS WE DO ON THIS WEBSITE. EDUCATING THE COMPLICIT MEDIA
ON THEIR VILE RADICAL FEMINIST/HOMOSEXUAL/MASONIC/ZIONIST/LAW SOCIETY PERSPECTIVE OF MEN, ESPECIALLY THOSE MEN MADE
HOMELESS AND PENNILESS THANKS TO THEIR CORRUPT EVIL SYSTEM.
OUR WEBSITE GIVEN A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH BY McAFEE.
'We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems'
We reproduce important articles under 'fair use' and in the 'public interest'
with due credit to our sources.
DUE TO MANY ATTACKS ON OUR WEBSITE WE REQUIRE THREE DOMAINS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED
LATEST NEWS UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY
EXPOSING WHAT THE MASS MEDIA REFUSE TO EXPOSE (THANKS TO THEIR MEDIA LAWYER CENSORS)
BY REMAINING ON THIS SITE YOU ACCEPT WHATEVER COOKIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE WEBSITE TO FUNCTION
IMO VIDEO CHANNELS NOW MORE POPULAR THAN CNN
SMUG BILLIONAIRE GIT OF THE MONTH
We are not here to promote the ultra-rich but to counter their mass media buddies who are trying
to convince us there is NO MONEY and that the political lackeys, who they fund, are making policies,
NOT for the greater good of all the world's people, but to make the ultra-rich even richer. Less than
1% of the people of this world own more than 90% of the world's wealth and that we aim to correct the
lies and deceit about just who are responsible for that massive imbalance.
The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist
The Obama administration has quietly approved a substantial expansion of the terrorist watchlist system, authorizing a secret process that requires neither “concrete facts” nor “irrefutable evidence” to designate an American or foreigner as a terrorist, according to a key government document obtained by The Intercept.
The “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance,” a 166-page document issued last year by the National Counterterrorism Center, spells out the government’s secret rules for putting individuals on its main terrorist database, as well as the no fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings. The new guidelines allow individuals to be designated as representatives of terror organizations without any evidence they are actually connected to such organizations, and it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to place entire “categories” of people the government is tracking onto the no fly and selectee lists. It broadens the authority of government officials to “nominate” people to the watchlists based on what is vaguely described as “fragmentary information.” It also allows for dead people to be watchlisted.
Over the years, the Obama and Bush Administrations have fiercely resisted disclosing the criteria for placing names on the databases—though the guidelines are officially labeled as unclassified. In May, Attorney General Eric Holder even invoked the state secrets privilege to prevent watchlisting guidelines from being disclosed in litigation launched by an American who was on the no fly list. In an affidavit, Holder called them a “clear roadmap” to the government’s terrorist-tracking apparatus, adding: “The Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed … could cause significant harm to national security.”
The rulebook, which The Intercept is publishing in full, was developed behind closed doors by representatives of the nation’s intelligence, military, and law-enforcement establishment, including the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, and FBI. Emblazoned with the crests of 19 agencies, it offers the most complete and revealing look into the secret history of the government’s terror list policies to date. It reveals a confounding and convoluted system filled with exceptions to its own rules, and it relies on the elastic concept of “reasonable suspicion” as a standard for determining whether someone is a possible threat. Because the government tracks “suspected terrorists” as well as “known terrorists,” individuals can be watchlisted if they are suspected of being a suspected terrorist, or if they are suspected of associating with people who are suspected of terrorism activity.
“Instead of a watchlist limited to actual, known terrorists, the government has built a vast system based on the unproven and flawed premise that it can predict if a person will commit a terrorist act in the future,” says Hina Shamsi, the head of the ACLU’s National Security Project. “On that dangerous theory, the government is secretly blacklisting people as suspected terrorists and giving them the impossible task of proving themselves innocent of a threat they haven’t carried out.” Shamsi, who reviewed the document, added, “These criteria should never have been kept secret.”
The document’s definition of “terrorist” activity includes actions that fall far short of bombing or hijacking. In addition to expected crimes, such as assassination or hostage-taking, the guidelines also define destruction of government property and damaging computers used by financial institutions as activities meriting placement on a list. They also define as terrorism any act that is “dangerous” to property and intended to influence government policy through intimidation.
This combination—a broad definition of what constitutes terrorism and a low threshold for designating someone a terrorist—opens the way to ensnaring innocent people in secret government dragnets. It can also be counterproductive. When resources are devoted to tracking people who are not genuine risks to national security, the actual threats get fewer resources—and might go unnoticed.
“If reasonable suspicion is the only standard you need to label somebody, then it’s a slippery slope we’re sliding down here, because then you can label anybody anything,” says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent with experience running high-profile terrorism investigations. “Because you appear on a telephone list of somebody doesn’t make you a terrorist. That’s the kind of information that gets put in there.”
The fallout is personal too. There are severe consequences for people unfairly labeled a terrorist by the U.S. government, which shares its watchlist data with local law enforcement, foreign governments, and “private entities.” Once the U.S. government secretly labels you a terrorist or terrorist suspect, other institutions tend to treat you as one. It can become difficult to get a job (or simply to stay out of jail). It can become burdensome—or impossible—to travel. And routine encounters with law enforcement can turn into ordeals.
In 2012 Tim Healy, the former director of the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, described to CBS News how watchlists are used by police officers. “So if you are speeding, you get pulled over, they’ll query that name,” he said. “And if they are encountering a known or suspected terrorist, it will pop up and say call the Terrorist Screening Center…. So now the officer on the street knows he may be dealing with a known or suspected terrorist.” Of course, the problem is that the “known or suspected terrorist” might just be an ordinary citizen who should not be treated as a menace to public safety.
Until 2001, the government did not prioritize building a watchlist system. On 9/11, the government’s list of people barred from flying included just 16 names. Today, the no fly list has swelled to tens of thousands of “known or suspected terrorists” (the guidelines refer to them as KSTs). The selectee list subjects people to extra scrutiny and questioning at airports and border crossings. The government has created several other databases, too. The largest is the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE), which gathers terrorism information from sensitive military and intelligence sources around the world. Because it contains classified information that cannot be widely distributed, there is yet another list, the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB, which has been stripped of TIDE’s classified data so that it can be shared. When government officials refer to “the watchlist,” they are typically referring to the TSDB. (TIDE is the responsibility of the National Counterterrorism Center; the TSDB is managed by the Terrorist Screening Center at the FBI.)
In a statement, a spokesman for the National Counterterrorism Center told The Intercept that “the watchlisting system is an important part of our layered defense to protect the United States against future terrorist attacks” and that “watchlisting continues to mature to meet an evolving, diffuse threat.” He added that U.S. citizens are afforded extra protections to guard against improper listing, and that no one can be placed on a list solely for activities protected by the First Amendment. A representative of the Terrorist Screening Center did not respond to a request for comment.
The system has been criticized for years. In 2004, Sen. Ted Kennedy complained that he was barred from boarding flights on five separate occasions because his name resembled the alias of a suspected terrorist. Two years later, CBS News obtained a copy of the no fly list and reported that it included Bolivian president Evo Morales and Lebanese parliament head Nabih Berri. One of the watchlists snared Mikey Hicks, a Cub Scout who got his first of many airport pat-downs at age two. In 2007, the Justice Department’s inspector general issued a scathing report identifying “significant weaknesses” in the system. And in 2009, after a Nigerian terrorist was able to board a passenger flight to Detroit and nearly detonated a bomb sewn into his underwear despite his name having been placed on the TIDE list, President Obama admitted that there had been a “systemic failure.”
Obama hoped that his response to the “underwear bomber” would be a turning point. In 2010, he gave increased powers and responsibilities to the agencies that nominate individuals to the lists, placing pressure on them to add names. His administration also issued a set of new guidelines for the watchlists. Problems persisted, however. In 2012, the U.S. Government Accountability Office published a report that bluntly noted there was no agency responsible for figuring out “whether watchlist-related screening or vetting is achieving intended results.” The guidelines were revised and expanded in 2013—and a source within the intelligence community subsequently provided a copy to The Intercept.
The five chapters and 11 appendices of the “Watchlisting Guidance” are filled with acronyms, legal citations, and numbered paragraphs; it reads like an arcane textbook with a vocabulary all its own. Different types of data on suspected terrorists are referred to as “derogatory information,” “substantive derogatory information,” “extreme derogatory information” and “particularized derogatory information.” The names of suspected terrorists are passed along a bureaucratic ecosystem of “originators,” “nominators,” “aggregators,” “screeners,” and “encountering agencies.” And “upgrade,” usually a happy word for travellers, is repurposed to mean that an individual has been placed on a more restrictive list.
The heart of the document revolves around the rules for placing individuals on a watchlist. “All executive departments and agencies,” the document says, are responsible for collecting and sharing information on terrorist suspects with the National Counterterrorism Center. It sets a low standard—”reasonable suspicion“—for placing names on the watchlists, and offers a multitude of vague, confusing, or contradictory instructions for gauging it. In the chapter on “Minimum Substantive Derogatory Criteria”—even the title is hard to digest—the key sentence on reasonable suspicion offers little clarity:
“To meet the REASONABLE SUSPICION standard, the NOMINATOR, based on the totality of the circumstances, must rely upon articulable intelligence or information which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or has been knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to TERRORISM and/or TERRORIST ACTIVITIES.”
The rulebook makes no effort to define an essential phrase in the passage—”articulable intelligence or information.” After stressing that hunches are not reasonable suspicion and that “there must be an objective factual basis” for labeling someone a terrorist, it goes on to state that no actual facts are required:
“In determining whether a REASONABLE SUSPICION exists, due weight should be given to the specific reasonable inferences that a NOMINATOR is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his/her experience and not on unfounded suspicions or hunches. Although irrefutable evidence or concrete facts are not necessary, to be reasonable, suspicion should be as clear and as fully developed as circumstances permit.”
While the guidelines nominally prohibit nominations based on unreliable information, they explicitly regard “uncorroborated” Facebook or Twitter posts as sufficient grounds for putting an individual on one of the watchlists. “Single source information,” the guidelines state, “including but not limited to ‘walk-in,’ ‘write-in,’ or postings on social media sites, however, should not automatically be discounted … the NOMINATING AGENCY should evaluate the credibility of the source, as well as the nature and specificity of the information, and nominate even if that source is uncorroborated.”
There are a number of loopholes for putting people onto the watchlists even if reasonable suspicion cannot be met.
One is clearly defined: The immediate family of suspected terrorists—their spouses, children, parents, or siblings—may be watchlisted without any suspicion that they themselves are engaged in terrorist activity. But another loophole is quite broad—”associates” who have a defined relationship with a suspected terrorist, but whose involvement in terrorist activity is not known. A third loophole is broader still—individuals with “a possible nexus” to terrorism, but for whom there is not enough “derogatory information” to meet the reasonable suspicion standard.
Americans and foreigners can be nominated for the watchlists if they are associated with a terrorist group, even if that group has not been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. They can also be treated as “representatives” of a terrorist group even if they have “neither membership in nor association with the organization.” The guidelines do helpfully note that certain associations, such as providing janitorial services or delivering packages, are not grounds for being watchlisted.
The nomination system appears to lack meaningful checks and balances. Although government officials have repeatedly said there is a rigorous process for making sure no one is unfairly placed in the databases, the guidelines acknowledge that all nominations of “known terrorists” are considered justified unless the National Counterterrorism Center has evidence to the contrary. In a recent court filing, the government disclosed that there were 468,749 KST nominations in 2013, of which only 4,915 were rejected–a rate of about one percent. The rulebook appears to invert the legal principle of due process, defining nominations as “presumptively valid.”
Killed by benefits cuts: Starving soldier died 'as result of Iain Duncan Smith's welfare reform'
Diabetic David Clapson, 59, died with just £3.44 left in his account after his Jobseeker’s Allowance was axed because he missed an appointment
A diabetic ex-soldier died starving and skint after officials axed his benefits.
David Clapson, 59, was stripped of the cash after missing an appointment under harsh Coalition reforms.
He died in Stevenage, Herts, with just £3.44 left in his account.
David once faced death on a daily basis as he served his country loyally in the terror hell of Northern Ireland.
And when he left the Army he went straight into the workplace with BT before becoming a full-time carer for his sick mother.
After she went into a home, diabetic David turned to the state for help while he looked for work.
But under the Coalition’s callous new benefits rules he had his £71.70 a week Jobseeker’s Allowance axed – merely because he missed an appointment with an adviser.
Stripped of his income, the 59-year-old could not afford food or electricity and died starving, penniless and alone at his home.
His death was from diabetic ketoacidosis – caused by not taking his insulin.
Tonight his distraught sister Gill Thompson told how she believes he may have stopped injecting himself with the life-saving drug after becoming so desperate over his lack of cash and work.
Choking back tears, she said: “I think he just gave up. I want the lessons to be learned. I don’t want anybody else to die. He shouldn’t have died like that. You wouldn’t let an animal die like that, would you?
“I just, I look at food now and think, ‘My brother didn’t have any.’
"My brother was not a scrounger. He was getting £71.70 a week. He was not living on champagne and caviar. They should have taken into account his past work and his condition.”
Stevenage council leader Sharon Taylor slammed Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith over David’s treatment.
She stormed: “He should hang his head in shame. David served his country. Treating him like this is disgusting.
“This tragic death is a direct result of Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms.”
When David died he had just £3.44 to his name, six tea bags, a tin of soup and an out-of-date can of sardines. His electricity card was out of credit meaning the fridge where he should have kept his insulin chilled was not working.
A coroner also found he had no food in his stomach.
A pile of CVs for job applications were found near David’s body.
Gill, 57, demanded a change to the welfare system she believes caused her brother’s death. She said officials knew he was diabetic as he nearly died when his benefits were stopped once before.
David, of Stevenage, Herts, had his benefits axed last summer for missing the appointment. There have been more than a million stoppages since the Coalition came to power in 2012.
David joined the Royal Signals Corps at 17 and served for two years in Belfast at the height of the Troubles in the 70s. He left as a lance corporal then worked for BT for 16 years.
He later had different jobs until he became his mum’s carer when she got dementia. That ended when she got too ill to stay at home. David took two unpaid placements but was denied a third.
Officials wrote to him on June 28 saying his Jobseeker’s Allowance would be stopped from July 12 until August 8. A last payment of £122.10 went in to his account on July 2.
David was found dead on July 20. Gill, from London, wrote to officials after his death. She said: “The answers came back, ‘Oh well, we followed procedures.’ Well I’m sorry to say the procedures don’t work if people die.”
Gill also told how David was also sanctioned in 2010 after not putting enough information down on a claim form. He fell ill but was rescued by a neighbour.
The DWP insisted he would have been told payments would still be available after sanctions.
A spokesman said: “Claimants can get financial support through the hardship fund. People can also appeal against sanctions.”
Not only are the authorities abusing us going on and off aircraft but
the slightest issue causes a massive over reaction
Freemason's tax dodging Cayman Islands in bungled masonic met probe
The Cayman Islands we have been exposing as a top freemason tax dodging haunt where billions are being removed
from Britain and across the globe to stash in offshore banks to prop up the biggest satanic cult on the planet and its
patron the royal parasite herself
The great Sunshine Squad fiasco: Taxpayers face £500k legal bill for Met's bungled probe in the Cayman Islands
British taxpayers face a legal bill of up to half a million pounds over a disastrous undercover Metropolitan Police investigation into corruption in the Caribbean.
Senior Scotland Yard officers were sent to the Cayman Islands and their inquiry eventually resulted in the arrest of a judge and suspension of two local police chiefs.
But there were no convictions, the judge and police chiefs sued successfully for damages and the Met team were nicknamed the ‘Sunshine Squad’ when pictures emerged of them relaxing on the beach during the failed two-year operation.
Seven years on, the now-retired policeman who led the probe, Martin Bridger, is still being sued in England and the Caymans – and The Mail on Sunday can reveal that his legal costs of up to £448,000 will be picked up by the public after the Met agreed to keep paying them.
Last night one insider said: ‘I’m astonished that the taxpayer is still paying for something like this after all these years.’
The debacle began back in September 2007 when the Foreign Office asked the Met to help investigate alleged corruption in the Cayman Islands, which is a British Overseas Territory.
A team from the elite Directorate of Professional Standards, posing as estate agents, was sent on the 4,800-mile trip to look into claims that a deputy police commissioner was leaking sensitive information to a local newspaper editor.
Detective Chief Inspector Bridger, who had been commander of Lambeth borough in South London, was Senior Investigating Officer.
In March 2008, a Briton serving in the Cayman police, Stuart Kernohan, was suspended and later sacked. Six months later Judge Alexander Henderson was arrested by the Yard team and his office and computer were searched.
Neither was ever charged with any offence, and British judge Sir Peter Cresswell ruled Judge Henderson’s arrest had been illegal. He was awarded $1 million damages.
In May 2009, Mr Bridger and his 12-strong team returned home. In October that year an auditor found ‘significant deficiencies’ in the management and accounting of the police investigation, with the cost to the Caymans put at £8 million.
Since then the case has descended into a blizzard of lawsuits involving Mr Bridger, Mr Kernohan and the Cayman authorities, with criminal complaints, misconduct claims and employment cases lodged.
A spokesman for the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime said: ‘Payments have been made amounting to £180,000 and authorisation has been given in respect of further costs up to £268,000. This financial assistance reflects the Metropolitan Police’s support to an officer in respect of legal proceedings arising out of an overseas posting.
‘This latest sum is conditional upon Mr Bridger taking steps to bring these matters to a swift conclusion.’
Speaking about the saga earlier this year, Mr Bridger said: ‘I have done nothing wrong other than trying to expose the truth and to defend myself as best as I can.’
We have to free the Palestinians and hold Israel to account for their war crimes VIDEO
"RESISTANCE IS NOT TERRORISM!" VIDEO
CNN Admits PROPAGANDA Is An Integral Part Of War VIDEO
Tory mafia's BIG society redirects public money into their crooked coffers
Every contract dished out by the tory mafia ultimately ends up, via their donors, back in their own coffers.
Public money used to fund the tories murderous agenda via the likes of ATOS and a myriad of companies under the guise
they are helping the unemployed into work when they have ulterior uses for diverted resources.
Big Society Network under investigation over 'funding misuse'
Watchdog examining whether charity set up to lead David Cameron's initiative used funds to pay debts of linked company
An investigation has begun into the use of taxpayer-funded grants by the charity set up to lead David Cameron's "big society" initiative.
The Charity Commission was examining whether funding for a childhood obesity project was used to pay the debts of a linked company. The commission was also seeking more information on payments allegedly made for consultancy services to two directors of the Big Society Network (BSN) and its chair, Martyn Rose, a Conservative Party donor.
News of the investigation comes days after a public spending watchdog issued a critical report about how National Lottery and government funds were handed over to and used by the BSN.
A former trustee of one grants body has claimed it was "forced" to award a total of £480,000 to the project without undertaking the usual checks.
The shadow civil society minister Lisa Nandy said she was asking the cabinet secretary to investigate whether political pressure was exerted to secure money for ministers' "pet projects".
The BSN was launched by the prime minister at 10 Downing Street two months after the coalition took office, with the aim of encouraging the kind of community work and volunteering Cameron had put at the heart of the party's manifesto for the election.
The performance of many of its projects has been heavily criticised and the National Audit Office (NAO) exposed problems with how £2m worth of grants were handed over to it.
The NAO said the Big Lottery Fund failed to challenge the BSN's "ambitious" target to recruit a million members a year to one particular initiative, despite the meeting of that target being crucial to its success. The Your Square Mile project was given an £830,000 lottery grant, but attracted only 64 members. The grant was also allowed to be transferred to a new company set up by the BSN chairman and another director, without checking that it had the IT skills to make the scheme work, the NAO said.
Its report also found that the £300,000 childhood obesity grant was made "contrary to the Cabinet Office's own guidelines" and even though it did not meet its criteria for funding.
The Independent reported that officials had been told to "go back and change the criteria".
The funding was halted after £200,000 had been handed over because of the project's poor performance, and the Cabinet Office did not recoup any of the funds.
Civil Society News reported that another £480,000 was handed over by the innovation funders Nesta, now a private organisation but then a quango, without a competitive pitch.
One of its former trustees, Liam Black, has said it was "forced" to hand over the resources for setting up BSN and several projects, branding it a "scandalous waste of money".
A Charity Commission spokeswoman confirmed that it was examining the award and use of funds by the BSN's charity arm.
"Our case into the Society Network Foundation remains open and ongoing," she said.
"We have received a response to questions we had relating to connected party transactions and the use of a grant, however this does not fully address our concerns and we are in the process of engaging further with the trustees.
"We are also awaiting copies of documents that explain the grounds on which a grant was given."
Rose, who the Independent reported had contributed more than £54,000 to the 2010 Conservative election campaign, told the newspaper he did not recall the payment from the network but said tit was possible that "one of my companies did work on its behalf".
He said he put £200,000 of his own money into the Big Society Network, which he had not got back, and defended its operations.
"With hindsight, of course, if we had all known that the projects were not going to work we would have been idiots to do them," he said. "In the early stages of social investment some will work and some won't."
Nesta told Civil Society News: "While the vast majority of Nesta's grants are made following open calls for proposals, we do have the ability to provide grants to projects that fit with our vision and advance our objects outside of open calls for proposals.
"That is what happened with the grants to the Big Society Network."
Nandy said the entire big society project lay "in tatters" and called for an investigation.
"It's bad enough that millions of pounds of public money were squandered, but the connections between these organisations and the Conservative party are deeply concerning," she said.
"I am writing to cabinet secretary Jeremy Heywood to ask him to investigate the process by which the grants in question were given.
"We must know if political pressure was applied to give an organisation with close ties to ministers special treatment.
"At a time when many charities are fighting to survive, handing out large sums of money to flawed, pet projects is inexcusable."
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: "The awarding of this grant has been the subject of intensive investigation by Cabinet Office and independently by the NAO.
"Both investigations found no rules were broken and the matter is now closed."
The psychopaths the state employs for their tyrannical control
The most dangerous psychopath on the planet and loyal lord lieutenant and freemason for the world's top despot the royal parasite
Do you remember the wee scumbags in school who used to try and become top dog by bullying the weaker kids or those who would not play their nasty little thuggish games? The psychopathic minds that began to erupt in the dysfunctional families that then spilt over into the lives of the decent guys in society?
You can but guess where they end up ? Employed in the many arms of the bully boy state as prison warders, cops and military. The clever psychopaths end up as lawyers, judges and politicians while those with far less brain cells take on the role of the enforcers of the political and legal mafia's . So how do they keep a control over ALL these psychopaths? FREEMASONRY.
The satanic cult ensures the psychopaths, who are given key positions to throw their weight around as if they were still in school,
are held to account by selling their souls to the devil and swearing vile oaths, meanwhile men not part of their creepy weirdness have to put up with dealing with the many arms of the state psychopathy that masquerades as some sort of law enforcement.
The very psychopaths who enforce those laws are immune from their punishable outcomes by an UNTOUCHABILITY knowing they will have the protection of their lodge buddies embedded in the pseudo regulatory bodies to give the ILLUSION to the sheeple of some sort of accountability, when there is NONE.
The main reason Jimmy Savile and his many associates caught up in their blackmail network of abuse claimed to their victims they were also untouchable. Well that was until the shit hit the fan and suddenly from nowhere the gutter press, who have protected these evil bastards arses for decades are now forced to expose just exactly what they have been protecting all that time. See the history of pervert Max Clifford on how they kept these creeps out of the limelight.
The internet finally gave a voice to those who had become victims of the most heinous of crimes. ALL the gutter press claimed Savile was a hero and legend on his death, that was until his victims finally had an outlet across the world wide web. As the recent homopaedo exposures are showing the once iron clad wall of steel is slowly melting away and the state assassins are finally being exposed like never before and we hope we ourselves are playing a part in bringing these evil bastards down and that cannot come fast enough for the many men still caught up in the biggest crime wave across this planet, family courts and where masonic judges, hand picked by the royals loyal lord lieutenant the Dukey Kent are wiping men out with their tyranny.
He is the top spymaster and procurer of the thugs who think they can enforce their evil regime indefinitely onto the long suffering men that have lost trillions through their very warped agenda. That regime cannot and will not get away with their crimes against humanity for much longer.
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL,
A WORLDWIDE ZIONIST CABAL AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.